Tag: moody bible institute

  • The gradual transformation of evangelical eschatology

    Those raised in evangelicalism were taught to believe that the world will only get worse until the Lord returns. Culture degrades, morality disintegrates, and the world falls apart to the point that only Jesus can rescue us from certain self-destruction.

    Listen to almost any traditional evangelical voice and you’ll hear this language peppered in. Things are getting worse, of course they are getting worse, things have to get worse for Jesus to come back. (This implies that they kind of WANT things to get worse so Jesus can come back.)

    This isn’t a historical eschatology of premillennialism and the general belief that Jesus would return to establish his Kingdom. Currently, much of this vantage point seems to be seated in a dispensational premillennialism which took root in the early 1900s, but was originally penned by John Darby in the 1830s.

    How did this become popular?

    The atrocities of World War I radically shifted people’s worldview. While the industrial revolution seemingly made life better and better, the Civil War brought an end to modern slavery, and modern medicine went about ending disease had elevated people’s general perception that the world was getting better. Those same technologies were used to kill hundreds of thousands of people in Europe– which dramatically flip-flopped the worldview the other way.

    People began to look at science, invention, and modernization with a new lens. We enjoyed the benefits while always giving a suspicious eye to how evil men and women may use this against us. (This is alive and well today, isn’t it? Read Christian advice on any technology and you’ll see them dance this line of benefit versus danger.)

    Evangelicalism became popular in that environment. People generally had a negative view of the world’s future and dispensationalism provided an explanation for it. It was the right message at the right time and lead to the rapid growth of the evangelical movement and the continued degradation of the mainline denominations we continue to see today. (Most of the mainline denominations rejected dispensational)

    Much of how we view the world today as American Christians is heavily influenced by a a relatively new eschatological view (non-historical) and one which relatively few Americans understand or hold dear. (dispensationalism)

    What does this have to do with me?

    As a student at Moody Bible Institute I was taught dispensationalism and pre-tribulational, pre-millennial eschatology as bona fide fact. (I always felt it was a little weird to be taught the future as fact. I guess I was alone in that!) We were all required to take classes which indoctrinated us in the tenants. We all passed tests. And to graduate we all had to sign that we believed in a pre-tribulational rapture. Yes, every graduate of Moody has signed this… forever!

    In a school that was so well-rounded in almost every other area this was the one thing they held onto as a distinctive! (And some silly rules about dancing, because we know dancing leads to amillennialism.) Moody isn’t alone. This is a core belief for traditional evangelicals.

    What does this have to do with you?

    I’m not saying dispensationalism is bad. And I’m not saying there’s no way there is a pre-tribulational rapture. (Though I do find the hermeneutics and evidence which lead to this conclusion as thin) Technically speaking, I’ve always affirmed premillennialism while holding views of a rapture at arms length… I’m not betting the farm on that one.

    This is important to you because it impacts the tone with which so many traditional evangelicals approach issues of the day. There is an implied negativity. You’ll hear phrases like, “This is really a shame. Of course we expect it to continue getting worse until the Lord returns.” It’s a tone and a stance that they don’t intend to do anything to make it better– because that’s the way it has to be for Jesus to come back!

    The shift to something else…

    Most evangelicals seem to be softening on this hardline view. Even as you read this you probably felt like there was a shadow of truth there but it isn’t really how things work in your life or ministry. That’s because we’re seeing things change in evangelicalism. The rise of the neo-reformers (Piper, Driscoll, Keller) has introduced a Reformed theological perspective, which flirts with the notion of things getting worse while affirms that Jesus makes things better in society when his people are at work in society.

    It doesn’t feel like people have landed, yet. But it it is clear that the traditional evangelical view of eschatology is having less and less impact on the ministry churches are doing on a day-to-day basis. In my view, this is great!

    Here are a few facts that might shock you:

    And just like the scary things of World War I brought about the rise of one theological perspective… The end of the Cold War and drops in these big, scary things are impacting how Christian view their place in the world.

    Where is this going? I’d love your thoughts.

  • A birthday fact

    birthday candles

    June 2nd is my birthday. I’m not a huge “happy birthday” kind of guy, but I thought since I am starting a new job on my birthday it would be timely to share a fun fact about me. 

    Pretty much every job of my adult life has been started within a day of my birthday. 

    Monday I start with Youth Specialties. June 1st 2003 I started with Romeo. June 1st 2002 I started with EFC Oroville, CA. Roughly June 1st 2001 I started an internship at a church in the Chicago area. June 1st 1996 was my first day at Timber-lee as a summer staffer. And going all the way back to 1994, my first “real job” as a painter at Moody Bible Institute started on June 2nd. 

    Pretty weird little detail, eh?

  • Disagreeing with the Alma Mater

    moody studentDo you ever have times when you look at your college and you go, “What are they thinking?That’s how I feel about my alma mater, Moody Bible Institute lately.

    Actually, I don’t have a single problem with the education they are providing. The longer I’ve been away from MBI the more I’ve appreciated their focus on ministry preparation. They are doing what 99% of Christian colleges refuse to do, prepare students for vocational ministry at the undergraduate level. I am very thankful for the excellent degree I earned from Moody. If anyone is looking for a ringing endorsement of their programs… you’ve got one from me.

    But I am disappointed in Moody Press. (An arm of the school) I’ve reviewed several of their books in the past and one of the things that drives me nuts is that they seem to have a negative bend on pop culture. (Look at their website, you’ll get a glimpse on the style of fear they use to sell books.) For instance… the books I read last year all mentioned September 11, 2001 in the opening chapter as a literary hook to the books over-riding topic of spiritual warfare. [Sorry, I think that’s as cheap as appealing to Hitler to talk about politics.] And this year they have released a couple of books with a negative view of “emerging church.” (Something I’m neutral on.) Now, it doesn’t bother me that
    they want to write apologetics for “traditional evangelicalism” as that’s to be expected from an institution who forced out a bunch of professors who took a positive view on something as benign as progressive dispensationalism. What is bothersome is that these publications approach cultural questions from a defensive, rather than discussion, angle. (Here’s my review of their hot title right now, “Sex, Sushi, and Salvation.”) In Sex, Sushi, and Salvation… the author essentially made fun of the emergent discussion. To me this lacked class as it devalued the many good people who are exploring it legitimately.

    Let me clarify. I don’t think this is an abnomaly/conspiracy for Moody. I think this is very much the “old traditions” doing what they always do… keep the base happy, don’t take risks, publish things that are safe even if it offends the majority with its simplicity.

    What breaks my heart about this approach is that as they continue to publish books with a very “1990s” approach to culture and the result is that readers are paying less and less attention to what is being published. I can’t think of the last time people were buzzing about a Moody book.  That’s a concern. I want to see the best stuff with my alma maters name on it… and if it weren’t for Ray Pritchard I’m not sure I’d be excited about anything they are publishing. I keep trying and will keep trying, it just hasn’t been rewarding lately.