• 7 programs running on my laptop all day

    1. Microsoft Outlook (church mail)
    2. Mozilla Thunderbird (YMX mail)
    3. iTunes
    4. PhotoShop
    5. AIM
    6. Mozilla Firefox
    7. Filezilla

    What about you? What are programs that run on your desktop/laptop all the time?

  • for Him

    Colossians 1:16 is a very interesting passage, especially in thinking of politics.

    "For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities–all things have been created through Him and for Him.

    When you think about it, "for Him" is a pretty powerful statement. It’s also perplexing. In inclusiveness of this sentence is amazing as "all things" pretty much means Jesus Christ not only allowed the creation of all things (people, places, organizations, etc) but that he actually created all things, "by Him."

    So quickly make a list of all the stuff in the world you don’t like. [At least mentally] And then do something like this…

    • Microsoft Zune was created by Him…
    • Super soft blankets at Kohl’s were created by Him…
    • Smelly people who want hugs were created by Him…
    • That pile of snot that runs out of babies noses was created by Him…
    • Governments that allow thousands to starve or be persecuted because of their race were created by Him…
    • The United States tax code was created by Him…
    • The 2.5 million ads we’ll watch in the next 12 months about candidates were created by Him…

    But for what purpose? Jesus, why did you create those things?

    For Him.

    Que? Makes you think, doesn’t it?

    • Why did He create these things?
    • What was He trying to communicate to us in creating them?
  • “We celebrate Halloween”

    Power_rangers_040I noticed a couple of people were sharing what their kids were dressing up like for Halloween… so here are our kids. (Kristen has a full post about this.)

    As a person who didn’t grow up around evangelicalism I didn’t know that some folks didn’t celebrate Halloween until I was a in college. As a kid all I knew was that some people were home and didn’t give out candy and I just thought and said to my friends, "Jerks" as we walked by.

    Are people who don’t give out candy on Halloween jerks?
    As an adult I don’t think so. Now I know that people don’t give out candy for a few reasons, religious conviction being one of them.

    Why do we allow our kids to go out for Halloween?

    1. I grew up doing it. In college I always thought the arguments against it were pretty lame so I never bought into the evangelical idea that "Halloween is bad." if we should protect our kids from "evil" than we shouldn’t have had kids in the first place. The world is full of darkness and sin.
    2. We like interacting with our neighbors. We live in a backyard culture where only Halloween and bad weather bring people together. Seriously… other than Halloween the only time I’ve met some of my neighbors (more than next door) is when trees fall down.
    3. We restrict their costume choices. You may think that at 4 & 6 years old this is easy… but it leads to a good discussion of "good pretend" and "bad pretend."
    4. Our kids like candy. I can’t imagine the horror of being a small child and knowing all your friends got mountains of candy and you didn’t. And to do that "for Jesus." While we should suffer for the name of Christ, we need to pick our battles.

    Do you "endorse" Halloween by celebrating it?
    I would loosely say we celebrate Halloween. We’re just not one of those people who goes all out for any holiday. Just like we put out a few lights for Christmas, we put out a few pumpkins for Halloween. Here’s a summary of what we do and I would recommend this to anyone:

    1. Mommy takes the kids trick or treating. We always invite friends to go with the kids so that its a social night. For them they get to see bucketloads of neighbors they’d otherwise never meet or see.
    2. I stay home and hand out candy. My conviction is this… as a pastor to a dead and dying community (spiritually) if 300+ people are going to knock on my door I want to represent Jesus to them as best as I can. Romeo is a small town and people would know if I was "the jerk" on the block who didn’t turn on his light. In fact, we plan on setting up our Halloween table again this year. We’ll have a table with hot chocolate, apple cider, and coffee for parents and of course mountains of candy for the kids. As families from all over Armada, Almont, Bruce Township, and other rural areas come to my house… I want to welcome them and tell them about the kids ministry! This isn’t an endorsed thing that I do on behalf of the church. It’s a thing that I do and I’m pretty sure I would do if I weren’t a pastor at the church. In fact, I wish more families from the church would embrace Halloween as a ministry opportunity.

    What about Halloween Alternatives?
    At the core of who I am I always want to use the things in our culture for redemptive purposes, even the "bad" ones. Having an alternative Halloween activity isn’t bad, and in some communities it is extremely culturally relevant. But my observation is these alternative activities are really "culture avoidance" and not culturally relevant.

    As a student of the Bible I can imagine a very "proper" Jew like Paul feeling extraordinarily uncomfortable as he went to places like Corinth (a place that worshiped gods with temple prostitutes) or preaching in the agora of many places where vendors sold meet sacrificed to idols. He was likely sick to his stomach as he witnessed these things… and yet his job was to bring light into dark places. The implication of that verse is that we ought not to expect dark places (Halloween) to come to light (church)… but that we go to dark places for the purpose of bringing light.

  • YMX Hosting Handout


    ymxhosting handout, originally uploaded by mclanea.

    What do you think? This is a half sheet-er that we are working on for the NYWC in a few weeks.

  • Good Prank

    Well, my mom sent this to me. And if it’s funny enough for mom its funny enough for me.

    HT to Mom

  • Facebook and Microsoft Deal Makes Unreal Math

    Microsoftlogo
    Microsoft Corp. found a friend in Facebook on Wednesday, paying $240
    million for a small slice of the rapidly growing social networking Web
    site.

    The deal, for which Microsoft reportedly beat archrival Google,
    expands the Redmond company’s advertising relationship with Facebook
    and gives it an ownership stake in one of the hottest online properties.

    Facebook
    But the companies were immediately questioned about the $15 billion
    value that the deal places on Facebook, which puts Microsoft’s
    ownership interest at 1.6 percent. Earlier reports of that figure
    raised concerns about possible overvaluation of Facebook and other "Web
    2.0" sites.

    "Obviously, $15 billion is a pretty big number for Facebook," said
    analyst Brad Reback of CIBC World Markets, in the first question of a
    conference call in which the companies discussed the agreement. He
    noted that Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer was recently quoted
    commenting on the "faddish nature" of social networking Web sites.
    News

    Just doing a little quick math. $15 billion means that each account as of October 24th is now worth $300. When you start thinking… how is Microsoft going to monetize my account to be worth more than $300 to them (because profit was obviously the motive of this deal) than you start to see why I predict Facebook will die among students the way MySpace has.

    Trebek2
    If you think that is some crazy math…

    With the United States military preparing to spend $200 billion in Iraq in 2008… that works out to about $1 million per soldier. (200,000 deployed) Something tells me the soldiers aren’t getting $1 million worth of stuff.

    I’m not saying we should leave Iraq or anything about the war itself. Just… that’s crazy math.

  • 10-20-30 Tag

    Mykel tagged me and this one is pretty fun. So I’ll play along.

    October 1997
    Kristen and I were newly married and living a few blocks north of Moody as she finished her senior year. As we joke, she was late to a lot of classes back then. I was working for BlueCross and had just gotten hired full time. Kristen and I were attending Calvary but were barely involved. I remember one Sunday we took the train past our stop after church to go to a pet store and found ourselves right in the middle of the gay pride parade. That was pretty funny… a yuppy married couple with their bible’s walking past the gay pride parade. Man, we had fun the first year we were married. Every day was an adventure.

    October 1987

    I was in 5th grade at Swanson Elementary School in South Bend, Indiana. I was just getting settled into Swanson as my mom moved us out of the city and to Granger that summer. I had Mr. Hemminger for 5th grade. All I really remember from that year was his teaching us how bad smoking was by making some contraption where a bowl smoked itself.

    October 1977
    I was about 18 months old and don’t remember a thing. Pretty sure I was learning to read by then. I know I was working on calculus by 2 so I had to be wrapping up geometry.

    I’m tagging Jeremy, Raitz, and Todd.

  • The economy of hate

    The economy of hate

    I probably spend more time on the internet than anyone else I know. I’ll admit it, I’m a web dork. Let me try to spell out a trend I see on ministry websites, youth ministry sites, personal blogs, Facebook, and the rest of the social media/social networking map.
    If the news (Media 1.0) was subtitled “If it bleeds, it leads.” The citizen news (Media 2.0) could be subtitled “If it flames, it sells.”

    Here’s a simple fact about the internet: If you want the easiest way to draw traffic to your site/blog/ministry/church all you have to do is flame people. Start a site about how much you hate something and you’ll draw traffic.

    My definition of “flame” on the net:
    To bad mouth for the sake of creating discussion and more bad mouthing without ever checking the source to fact check.

    Example: I’m on the pastoral staff at my church. In 5+ years of full time ministry I can only think of 1-2 times when someone came to me in public or private and bad mouthed me. (Rumor mill doesn’t count since that’s ignored) But on the internet it happens many times a year. Obviously this happens because it’s not face to face, it doesn’t seem “real” and it is thought that things written on the internet don’t count as much as things said in person. (Uh, they still hurt!)

    Why is this?
    Here’s the way most stuff on the web works. I write about something and then the reader either talks about it or doesn’t. And people are more likely to link to or forward something that is dirty than they are something that is benign, informative, or encouraging. That’s just the nature of communicating in the new media. The result is that some people write purely to be read and since “flaming sells” they know that flaming people/ministries/churches will draw more notoriety, traffic, and ultimately income.

    Normal content + traffic = $1

    Hate content + traffic = $5

    That’s pretty much what it looks like. If your site or blog flames someone you’ll get more traffic. If you do it habitually you’ll grow like mad. Look at Digg.com for example. (Chris Garret talked about this today) The only time my stuff gets on Digg is if I either post it myself or if I say something considered flame worth.

    Another example: 18 months ago I wrote an article about why I don’t do retreats anymore. It wasn’t really a flame but it was slanted away from the camping industry. It got 4,000+ reads. Jason Raitz wrote the counter to that article… it only got read 1,000 times. A couple weeks ago we published an article called “Why most mission trips are a waste of time.” Forget the fact that the article was written 2 years ago… even though we’ve published pro-mission trip articles before… Noel’s article got mountains of traffic. (Compare the comments alone)

    So are you saying that all blog traffic is drawn to flame speech? Not at all… just among “normal content.” When you say something that is remarkable, the math looks like this:

    Remarkable content + traffic = $10+

    Which leads to my point… most people write hate/flame based content because they don’t have the guts/brains/skills to write something remarkable. In other words, it is easier to draw traffic with flame-worthy content than it is to draw traffic with remarkable content.

    Adam’s Law of Traffic: Write something remarkable and everyone will talk about it. Write about something you hate about someone and some people will talk about it. Write about normal stuff and only your mama will talk about it.

    (more…)