My favorite verse in the Bible is Genesis 50:20. “You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives.“
But my favorite book of the Bible is Acts. Acts is what happens when Jesus finally unleashes the hounds. Peppered through the Gospel narrative is a desire by some disciples to overthrow the government and usher in the new millennium. Acts documents that while the people wanted a full-frontal-assault to destroy the enemies of God, God’s Son unleashed a counter-insurgency of grace, the forgiveness of sins, and the binding of people together in love.
In Acts, Jesus takes Genesis 50:20 and widens the application from me and you as individuals, to entire cities, people groups, and nations!
In a way Jesus re-writes Genesis 50:20 with his very life, “Satan intended to destroy us by pitting us against one another, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives.”
I’ve read Acts upwards of 100 times. I’ve read commentary after commentary on the Luke-Acts narrative. I love how Luke puts things in order. It unleashes my strategic, creative mind. For me, it is full of AHA moments. Even this morning, as I read a big chunk of the narrative again, I’m in awe of how effective they were.
Sitting back and looking at the Luke-Acts books as a whole it makes me hypothesize. Perhaps the reason the Holy Spirit wanted Luke to put the Gospel narrative in sequential order might be so that future generations could pick up on the patterns/agendas/strategies that the Apostles implemented to completely obliterate the strongest empire the world has ever seen without using a single army?
If so, that’s a pretty cool strategy.
Man conquers the body; Jesus conquers the heart
The modern church movement in America largely depends on a single strategy morphed into a thousand different variations. It’s a Field of Dreams strategy: “If you build it, they will come.” A program, a good preacher, a building, on and on.
The weakness with that strategy is that it’s resource dependent. If you don’t have a great program manager you are sunk. You you can’t afford a great building you are sunk. If you don’t have a great preacher you are sunk.
And it all somehow flows back to money. As much as we hate that it’s about money, money lubricates the gears of the modern church machine.
The last 5 years, with the economy crashing down and churches re-thinking everything, has begged the question: Without money, what would church look like?
That’s actually the strategy we see employed in Acts.
Read it for yourself. In one sitting, right now, read Acts 17-20. Come back when you’ve read it. I’ll wait.

