Category: Politics

  • Saturday Morning Quarterbacks

    Obviously, this is election day. A day we’ve talked about in our nation for more than 2 years. Right now, both candidates have in their back pocket two speeches, one to celebrate that they have become the most powerful person on earth and the second to somehow admit a multi-million dollar defeat.

    But today is really not just about them. It’s about those of us with the ability to vote exercising our voice.

    In the morning there will voters distraught about the winner. Some will claim their desire to move to Canada. Here’s a little hint, our neighbors to the north don’t want you! Why is it that no one ever says that they are moving to Mexico? Just curious.

    Today is also a day when our eyes and ears will be glued to the television screen, internet news, and the radio. My prediction is that today the same quality work day as the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. We’re all “working” right?

    Rock the Dork Vote
    Rock the Dork Vote

    Last night I had a brief layover in Phoenix and with my Captain Obvious eyes I noted that everyone closely watched the news. For months the news anchors have tried to convince us that this election was a dead heat race for the finish. On CNN, Anderson Cooper did something that you see on ESPN a lot. “OK, we’ve talked about this for 24 months… now tell the nation what you think will happen tomorrow.” And one by one they took turns sharing their Saturday Morning Quarterback position. Several predicted Obama would recieve 370 electoral votes at minimum. One suggested as many as 500! While one man acknowledged that Obama holds a big lead he stepped out boldly to predict McCain will win by a [gray] hair and planted a seed that the polls have been rigged all along.

    Isn’t it awesome that we live in a nation where Saturday Morning Quarterbacks have a voice and journalism is as much about predictions as it is reporting the news of the day? I think it is facinating.

  • The stupidity of labels

    A couple times a week someone asks me if I’m a liberal or a conservative. So I want to say this loud and clear. My name is Adam McLane, I want my label to be “Christ-follower.” You can call me crazy. You can call me radical. But liberal or conservative are stupid titles.

    Here’s why the labels mean nothing. Labels like conservative and liberal are not black and white, it’s not that easy. They are completely subjective to the person asking the question as well as the question that person uses to determine if a person is “left or right” of them on that particular issue.

    Two examples from my world.

    Politics In this year’s election you have McCain vs. Obama. Mike Huckabee would call John McCain a liberal republican. But just about any democrat would label McCain a conservative. On the democratic side most democrats, who republicans call liberals, would consider Obama a liberal and themselves conservative. It is difficult in 2008 because one traditional test of a persons “liberal or conservative status” is determined by who is seen as the person with the best family values. Boy, that’s a tough call in 2008!

    In Christian circles the political labels reverse based on where you live. Traditionally, Christians in the north vote republican while Christians in the south trend towards democrats. Now Christians from the north or the south would have the same view that abortion is murder, but a “conservative” would use a persons belief on abortion as the litmus test for his candidacy while a “liberal” would use a litmus test along broader social policy lines.

    Church This is where it gets really scary. In conservative places, like my alma mater and the churches I’ve worked at, I was labeled a “liberal” in that I believe Paul, that men and women are equal in Christ. But with others, because I went to a “conservative” Bible college and have always worked at “conservative” churches and I personally believe in the inerrency of Scripture, I’m a borderline fundamentalist conservative Christian. the crazy thing is, in the church, these labels have so many litmus tests that no one truly is a conservative or liberal but most of us are both liberal and conservative at the same time.

    To further draw out the point from a church perspective. A “hard core conservative” would call teachings from a place like Willow Creek Community Church, liberal. But a “hard core liberal” would call the same teachings “conservative.” It’s all about perspective, baby!

    Here’s why labels like this are stupid. Most times I am asked the question, “Are you a liberal or conservative?” I have no freaking clue how to answer it. And most of the time, the people asking the question are mixing politics and religion together… which is something I think is equally difficult in a postmodern, pluralistic society. I think its possible to be a flamingly liberal on social issues while holding firmly to my conservative religious roots. But on other issues, I am flamingly liberal on matters of faith… longing to shake the church out of inaction into world change… while staunchly conservative on certain political matters. So the label is meaningless altogether.

    Labeling a person one way or the other is a dismissive thing to do. It devalues the entirity of a human being, someone bought and paid for by Jesus, into a label. This labelism is a dark mark against us as believers. It is a hate crime to a persons intellect which prevents us from fulfilling the Great Commission. Labels are, in fact, a devisive tool of our enemy, Satan. Labelism is emblematic of the label-fighting our Lord fought against. Over and over in the Gospels we see religious people asking Jesus litmus test questions. And over and over again, we see Jesus giving double answers that defied labeling.

    Remember when mom taught you, “Sticks and stones will break our bones, but words will never hurt me. She lied. Words (labels) are powerful. My challenge to is always the same, live wildly… crazily… passionately… stupidly… for Jesus Christ in all you do.

    Never be distracted by fans or haters!

  • But can you agree?

    Democrat and Republicans battleI watched a good chunk of both the DNC and RNC. I listened to the rhetoric of Democrats saying that Republicans are stupid and visa versa. I was especially annoyed during the RNC to hear a line-up of failed presidential candidates call Barack Obama stupid, young, and naive.

    And it left me with a single, two-fold question: Which candidate will be able to work to build bridges? Which candidate can unite a divided nation?

    That person is prepared to lead our country. Leading one party further to the left or the right isn’t interesting to me.

  • Paris Hilton is Totally Ready to Lead

    Looks like we’ve got another candidate to check out. And she claims she is hot. Is that with one “t” or two?

    See more Paris Hilton videos at Funny or Die

    True confession. I forgot to vote in the local primaries yesterday. Oops. I guess since I don’t plan on voting here in November it is probably better that way. Here are the results.

  • Mike Wallace interviews Margaret Sanger

    margaret sangerRecently, the University of Texas in Austin released a video collection of interviews between Mike Wallace and various people during the late 1950s. These are truly fascinating to watch!

    But I wanted to point you to an interview he did with Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger. You may remember I spoke about her a few weeks ago. This interview may help reveals a bit more about her, her motivations, her feelings about the Catholic Church, as well as shed light on how something as common (today) as birth control was talked about 50 years ago. Watch how she dodges questions, changes positions, and constantly says she’s been misquoted.

    For conservative Christians, this also sheds light on the correlation we often see between birth control and abortion. (Something I was first exposed to during Bible college.)

    To watch the video, click here. Read interview transcripts

    HT to Boing Boing

  • Is James Dobson’s Reign Over?

    James Dobson I’ve talked about this before. But I think it is safe to say James Dobson no longer represents the middle of the road Christian. I don’t think I’m in the middle of the evangelical road, but I think it’s becoming clear that he’s now losing traction with the masses.

    I hate to sound like Rush Limbaugh. But I predicted sentiments like this. Middle of the road evangelicals are leaving the right-wing conservative camps in droves to express their dissatisfaction with their ignoring the policies that motivate young Christians to action. Justice. Equality. Education. Environment. These aren’t ideals to young Christians, they are minimum requirements and Dobson’s old-fogey-out-of-touch ways aren’t even on their map.

    Prime example of Dobson’s lack of connection with today’s young Evangelicals:

    Should Sen. McCain capture the nomination as many assume, I believe this general election will offer the worst choices for president in my lifetime. I certainly can’t vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama based on their virulently anti-family policy positions. If these are the nominees in November, I simply will not cast a ballot for president for the first time in my life. These decisions are my personal views and do not represent the organization with which I am affiliated. They do reflect my deeply held convictions about the institution of the family, about moral and spiritual beliefs, and about the welfare of our country. Source

    How mature. He doesn’t get his hand-picked candidate so he isn’t going to vote. (Allegedly)  Good leadership there Mr. Dobson.

  • Dear Detroit Media: Leave Kwame Alone!

    kwame kilpatrickThe last 3-4 days the local news in Detroit has not left the mayor alone. There are some allegations about him surrounding whether or not he lied about an affair he had with a staff member a few years back.

    And the Detroit media is having a field day. It’s completely disgusting that they have nothing better to do than stalk this guy 24 hours per day. Television stations have sunk to new lows by flying their traffic helicopters over his house to see if his car is there. They are giving updates on his families movements, and virtually any other disgusting detail they can reveal.

    I have some advice for the Detroit media: Go back to covering lost dogs and stalled cars on the freeway. And don’t forget about your helpful segments, helping single moms get free cars or tracking down bad contractors to shame them. Those are things you are good at. Treating the nightly news like it is Access Hollywood is disgusting? Cut it out.

    Sure, he is a public figure. But this is too far. This story is not worth 24 hour coverage. It’s simply not news the people of this city want to hear.

  • Proud to be an American

    With a political year looming, this is a good reminder about who the American people really are. This video comes from Fenway Park on a day dedicated to people with disabilities. Check out what happens when the singers struggles with the National Anthem.

    HT to Douglas Karr

  • Progress in Iraq

    Progress in Iraq

    Yesterday I saw on CNN that US soldier fatalities are down 60% since June. In looking at the raw data you don’t have to get out a calculator to see that there are fewer soldiers being killed today than there were 3 months ago. This is good news! And yet the political spin doctors continue to say nothing good is happening in Iraq and we should leave immediately.

    Another sign of progress was reported on by the Associate Press this week. The headline reads, “Thousands Returning to a Safer Baghdad.” See, fleeing Iraq would be a lack of progress. Being safe enough to return to your homes is a sign of progress.

    Need proof that negativity is just bad press and political games? (Countdown to 2008, 365 days until we vote!)

    It’s all about perspective, isn’t it? It’s said that “if it bleeds it leads” in our press. Clearly, in our country hundreds are dying every day and the press doesn’t care. To the contrary, our soldiers are doing their best to stabilize a region, bring democracy somewhere that doesn’t want it, are defending a government elected by the people, and the press questions their every move and decision.

    Perspective matters in an election year. With 365 days until November 4th, 2008 we all need to be reminded that every news story has a political purpose. As we saw leading up to the 2004 election, the liberal media will stop at nothing to make their candidate look good and the people they don’t like look like idiots. They’ll talk about smaller issues for 8 hours per day in order to continue to avoid the big issue.

    What do you think? Is it all politics or is there really no progress in Iraq with no good news ever going to come?

  • Battles that are Brewing

    Battle_3It seems like there are some interesting battles brewing. I don’t mean like nations that are about to start new wars, I mean within the culture I live in, there have been and will be some gauntlet’s thrown down.

    Here’s a summary of the ones that I’m watching.


    youversion vs. Gospel.com
    Youversion
    I happen to be a beta user of both Web 2.0 utilities and while they are significantly different, both will be battling for the attention of Christian internet users. So far, I see the power in both of them. Youversion is a little more "open" as anyone can bookmark things. The flipside is that Gospel.com is only allowing Alliance members to bookmark content which means that all the content on Gospel.com will be more trustworthy.

    Emergent vs. Evangelicalism

    Robbell
    This recently heated up in what I’ll call "The Battle for Mars Hill." Jonathon Herron talks about Mark Driscoll calling Rob Bell a heretic. A few weeks ago Doug Pagitt and John MacArthur tangled on Headline News. Go ahead and grab a box of pop corn and get ready for fans of all sides to listen to the artists drop some game and scream, "Oh no he didn’t!" As Doug points out today, it’s already getting personal. Come on boys, no shots below the belt.

    Iran vs. America
    Iran
    OK, so this one isn’t as fun to watch as the rest. This could get really ugly really fast. Iran’s president is either completely oblivious to the fact that American’s don’t like him very much or he thinks he can win the American people with his charm. New story. The Scott Pelley interview that was on 60 Minutes last night was quite interesting.


    Lloyd Carr vs. Charlie Weis

    Charlieweis
    Who is in the hottest water with their team? Michigan fans have been quieted… but both groups of fans are not happy with how the season has gone. Lloyd Carr lost 4 games in a row before beating Notre Dame and Penn State. While Charlie Weis has list 5 in a row including 3 games where his offense failed to score a touchdown. That said, neither is in as imminent danger as 2006 Super Bowl quarterback Rex Grossman.

    Anyone else see battles brewing?